Audio Adventure
July 1996
Making a Racehorse out of an Old Plug
Daniels Zero One [Epsilon] CD Player
by Myles Astor, Equipment Editor
Can a modified $300 Phillips CD player equal the performance of multi-thousand
dollar digital products? Not yet, but if the $929 Daniels Zero One CD player
is any indication, we're coming closer to realizing that dream. Here at
long last is a CD player that merits comparison with digital processors/transports
costing serious dollars.
Visualizing Speed in a Workhorse Frame
The saga of the Zero One begins two years ago. Butch Daniels, a former
high-energy physics graduate student, observed that the phase and amplitude
coherence of many CD players was poor. Experimentation led him to conclude
that phase anomalies are more noticeable than amplitude distortions and often
neglected because they only come into play with complex music waveforms.
According to Daniels' literature, "amplitude distortion is just an attenuation
of the sine components (no change in the sine wave's shape and thus only
appears as a rounding of the edges of more complex waveforms. On the other
hand, phase distortion occurs at the nodes, and thus changes the shape of
a complex waveform by adding a glitch at a point of zero amplitude. For
10% phase distortion, this glitch will reach 10% of the sine wave's amplitude
at a time when there should be nothing."
The Magical Transformation
Not surprisingly, Daniels concentrated on reducing phase distortions when
modifying the Philips 921 CD player. His solution? Replace the stock analog
filter with a unit of his own design. Now the Zero One is DC coupled from
the digital-to-analog converter output to the output. Although Daniels left
the digital section unscathed, he did implement other changes to the player's
circuitry and parts. For example, the addition of a second D-core transformer
allows Daniels to isolate the analog and digital power supplies. Thus, the
plus and minus 12 V sides of the digital circuitry and analog section are
independently regulated. An additional benefit of using the D-core transformer
where the primary and secondary windings are separated is the removal of
AC line noise.
Active and passive parts didn't escape Daniels' soldering iron either.
Mallory polystyrene capacitors and 1% Japanese metal-film resistors replaced
stock power-supply and signal capacitors and resistors. Internal cabling
is Daniels' own Epsilon wire. Better quality gold-plated jacks replace cheesy
stock jacks. The only major complaint I had with the unit's function is
that the newest Philips CDM12.4 drive, which many feel is sonically superior
to the older CDM9 Pro, will not play enhanced CDs (music plus video CD-ROMs)
such as Sarah McLachlan's Freedom Sessions. (The variable output of
the player was the only item Daniels couldn't replace,
since it is part of the signal reconstruction chip.)
On the Track
The product of Daniels' time and effort is a CD player that brIngs music
to life. Voices exhibit a dynamic realism and ease reminiscent of the better
triode amplifiers. Performers are full bodied and rich, with real midrange
presence. Male voices on the extraordinary live recording of the Flirtations
(Flirt Records FL1001) are more than hollow electronic skeletons. Absent
is that characteristic silvery mass-market player coloration that makes
male singers sound like female singers. Both tonal rendition and articulation
of male voices are good, though a loss of air surrounding performers leads
to a darkening of the sound and a perceived lowering of vocal timbres. Daniels'
interconnect displayed many of the same qualities, which leads me to wonder
if different internal wiring might clear up this wart. At times, there was
a disconnect when the volume levels dropped below a certain point between
the lead singer and the backup Flirts. Despite this, the unit easily separates
a live from studio recording.
A remarkably expansive and transparent soundstage is marred by only a slight
veiling of performers. Each member of the Flirts is easily identifiable,
although images could be more tightly focussed. This loss of focus, however,
never detracts from the feeling of body behind the voice or the sounding
board of an instrument. Recreating this realistic soundstage will not occur,
though, if the unit sits on the stock feet. For this review, I used the
Goldmund cones or Air Pod 1s, though the TARA tiptoes proved to be a capable
stand-under.
| Tonality | 73 | Subtly darkened. Remarkably smooth and free of grain and harshness. Better than average retrieval of the harmonic envelope. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dynamics | 77 | Explosive dynamics, especially in lows. Breaks stereotype that inexpensive players can't reproduce dynamic accents. See timing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Resolution | 75 | Some loss of ambiance and nuances. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Imaging | 74 | Tremendous soundstage, especially with WATT/Puppy speakers Suggests size of recording space. Difficulty in focusing images is most serious shortcoming. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Timing | 80 | Music flows from the instruments. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | 77 | Leave the dissection tools at the lab. This little baby sings! Fun times in the digital town tonight! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||